Logo

With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?

Last Updated: 21.06.2025 00:25

With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?

We have photos of the round earth taken by many hundreds of satellites - owned by many different governments AND by many companies AND (with “cubesats”) by kids in college.

Your only defense against those claims is to yell “FAKE” or “CONSPIRACY”…but without any real reason why anyone would fake it - or what the conspiracists have to gain from this insanely difficult set of operations.

No Flat Earther has EVER explained the motion of the Sun and Moon around their flat earth model that can explain sunrise and sunset times all around the world.

How should an atheist respond to a religious person who asks, "Why do you hate God?" What are some appropriate and inappropriate ways to answer this question?

This is direct evidence. No complicated thinking-about-it things to worry your tiny brains.

Because this “evidence” that you imagine simply doesn’t exist - and yet the amount of evidence (indeed PROOF) that it’s nonsense is an enormous mountain:

No Flat Earther has EVER explained how a simple magnetic compass works in the southern hemisphere (or the region beyond the equatorial circle in their own maps).

You hold the door open for a lady and she stops in her tracks and screams at you, ‘Don’t hold the door for me! I’ll get it myself!’ What are your feelings or immediate reaction?

Just one person (like me) can provide at least two dozen disproofs of the Flat Earth - and at least another two dozen consequences that we’d EASILY be able to spot if the Earth was actually flat.

We have several hundred people who flew to space and saw it with their own eyes.

To pick just two things:

watchOS 26 preview: 5 new Apple Watch features I can’t wait to try - Tom's Guide

There’s a reason for that - it is literally, mathematically and geometrically impossible to do that other than on a sphere.

Now - there is NO piece of so-called evidence that you can provide that I cannot disprove. Try it. Post a piece of so-called flat-earth evidence in comments below - and I can single-handedly disprove it.

So - there you go. Two disproofs that no flat earther can explain.

Is a man who enjoys anal sex considered a sissy? For those who think so, why can't they be thought of as someone who enjoys a variety of sexual pleasure?